Ron
October 13th, 2002, 03:55 PM
The reason I don't use it because I didn't know it. The reasons I won't be using it are
The protection scheme would not be possible.
The pro's of this are just to minimal with our current and old computers it would not be a big difference. 900 kilobytes even the oldest harddisk should read that in 1-2 seconds.
My protection scheme is aimed against small time crackers that want to get rid of the copyright notice and sell girder with their hardware or somehow and thus be violating the copyright. Not to mention profiting from my hardwork.
If there was a way to make UPX compress an executable and NOT allow it to be decompressed I would use it, but since it is opensource this will not happen.
Please understand that this is the only way I can protect my work just a little. And I'm not willing to give this up. Maybe I'm being paranoid and maybe my scheme is so simple that any 1st grader will be able to remove it. Time will tell, though i don't hope so.
I have no problem with implementing another scheme that is compatible with an exe compressor, but i have no time to devise one.
I'm sorry for the no go on this one.
-Ron
The protection scheme would not be possible.
The pro's of this are just to minimal with our current and old computers it would not be a big difference. 900 kilobytes even the oldest harddisk should read that in 1-2 seconds.
My protection scheme is aimed against small time crackers that want to get rid of the copyright notice and sell girder with their hardware or somehow and thus be violating the copyright. Not to mention profiting from my hardwork.
If there was a way to make UPX compress an executable and NOT allow it to be decompressed I would use it, but since it is opensource this will not happen.
Please understand that this is the only way I can protect my work just a little. And I'm not willing to give this up. Maybe I'm being paranoid and maybe my scheme is so simple that any 1st grader will be able to remove it. Time will tell, though i don't hope so.
I have no problem with implementing another scheme that is compatible with an exe compressor, but i have no time to devise one.
I'm sorry for the no go on this one.
-Ron